Architecture reviews
A structured review of your system's design, scalability and weak points — with a prioritised fix list.
ServiceWeb Challengers
Practical advice on architecture, platform choice, modernisation, security and delivery risk — translating options into decisions your business can act on, with numbers attached.
Most technical consulting fails in one of two ways: a generic framework report that ignores your reality, or advice so hedged it commits to nothing. We do the opposite — we take a position. If we believe your platform choice is wrong, we say so in the first meeting, with reasoning.
Our advice is grounded in building, not slideware. Eighteen years of shipping websites, applications, commerce and rescue projects means we have lived the consequences of every recommendation we make — and we bring the trade-offs, costs and failure modes into the open.
Engagements end with something usable: a costed decision document, a reference architecture, a due-diligence verdict or a roadmap your board can approve. And if you want us to stay and implement it, we can — but the advice stands on its own.
Opinions with reasoning, not hedged options
Grounded in 18+ years of real delivery
Costs, risks and trade-offs stated in numbers
Output sized for decisions, not for shelves
Four formats cover most needs — each scoped tightly, each ending in something you can act on.
A structured review of your system's design, scalability and weak points — with a prioritised fix list.
A costed comparison of the realistic options, ending in a recommendation we're willing to defend.
For investors and acquirers: an honest read of a product's code, team and technical risk before money moves.
A staged, budgeted plan for getting from where the platform is to where the business needs it.
A practical review of exposure, prioritised by likelihood and impact — not a 200-page compliance recital.
A monthly retainer that puts a senior engineer in your corner for the decisions that keep arriving.
Short engagements, sharp questions, useful endings.
We start by agreeing exactly what decision this engagement must inform — and by when.
Code, infrastructure, contracts and metrics reviewed directly, plus the conversations that give them context.
Findings delivered as a recommendation with costs, risks and what we'd do in your place — in plain language.
Workshops with your team to land the decision — and optional hands-on help to implement it.
'Advise us on technology' produces essays; 'should we rebuild or modernise before our funding round' produces decisions. The sharpest engagements start with a named choice, a deadline and the person who will own the outcome — bring those three and the work becomes focused fast.
The most valuable sentence in consulting is 'don't do this'. An advisor who only ever validates the plan you arrived with is expensive theatre. Our positioning is simple: we will tell you what we'd do in your place, including advising against work we could sell you.
Straight answers about how this work is scoped, delivered and supported.
Ask something else →Not at all. Single-decision reviews are among our most useful engagements: one system, one week, one clear recommendation.
Only if you want it. Advice engagements stand entirely on their own, and our recommendations hold up whether or not we're the ones who build.
Yes — due diligence and advisory work routinely starts under mutual NDA, with findings shared only with the people you name.
A decision document: findings, options with costs and risks, a clear recommendation and the reasoning behind it — written to be read, not filed.
Bring us the choice you're weighing — platform, rewrite, hire, acquisition. We'll give you our honest read and the numbers behind it.
Book a consultation ↗