Schema & relationship design
Tables, keys, constraints and relationships designed around the domain and future reporting needs.
ServiceWeb Challengers
We design and improve relational data models, queries, indexes and migration paths so applications remain fast, understandable and safe as the amount of data and number of workflows increase.
A slow application is not always a server problem. Poor indexes, accidental N+1 queries, oversized tables and unclear relationships can make otherwise good code increasingly expensive to run.
We look at both schema and application behaviour: what the database stores, how the code asks for it, which reports need expensive aggregation, and which writes compete under load. The fix is often a combination rather than one magic index.
Changes are planned around data safety. Structural migrations, backfills and archival work are designed to be reversible where practical and tested against realistic data volumes before production.
Schema designed around real business relationships
Slow queries profiled before indexes are added
Migration plans that protect production data
Reporting and operational queries separated where needed
We can work on one bottleneck or take responsibility for the complete database improvement plan.
Tables, keys, constraints and relationships designed around the domain and future reporting needs.
Slow-query review, execution plans and application-level query analysis to identify the actual bottlenecks.
Indexes added deliberately for real query patterns without creating unnecessary write or storage cost.
Safe schema changes, bulk updates and backfills with rollback and verification steps.
Archival, partitioning, pagination and retention approaches for datasets that have outgrown simple patterns.
Backups, restore testing, access controls and operational checks for business-critical data.
Database work is safest when performance evidence and data integrity guide every change.
Capture slow queries, data size, access patterns and application behaviour.
Review schema relationships and identify structural issues that create repeated cost.
Apply indexes, query changes or migrations in controlled, testable steps.
Compare timings, resource use and data integrity after each material change.
The most useful inputs are the real pages, reports or background jobs that are slow in production.
Before structural work, confirm backups and restore procedures. A fast database is not an improvement if data safety gets weaker.
Straight answers about how this work is scoped, delivered and supported.
Ask something else →Often, yes. We first look for query, index and schema improvements that can be introduced safely before proposing wider code changes.
Yes. We plan structural changes and backfills around data volume, locking risk and rollback options, and test the sequence before production.
Yes. We can optimise the query path, introduce cached or precomputed reporting data, or separate analytical work when that is justified.
Yes. We can review application queries alongside RDS sizing, monitoring, backups and operational configuration.
Tell us which workflows are slow, what database you are running and how large the data has become.
Discuss your requirements ↗